Peer-reviewed Research Articles on Memory Loss in Elderly

Journal scope argument

The Periodical of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ^® publishes original experimental and theoretical inquiry on human cognition, with a special emphasis on learning, retentivity, language, and college cognition.

The journal publishes impactful articles of whatever length, including literature reviews, meta-analyses, replications, theoretical notes, and commentaries on previously published works in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Retention, and Cognition.

The journal places a high emphasis on methodological soundness and analytic rigor, as well every bit on the reproducibility and replicability of enquiry.

Disclaimer: APA and the editors of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Retentiveness, and Cognition assume no responsibility for statements and opinions advanced past the authors of its articles.

Journal highlights

• Submission Guidelines
• Editorial Board
• Abstracting & Indexing
• Open up Scientific discipline

Submission Guidelines

Prior to submission, please carefully read and follow the submission guidelines detailed beneath. Manuscripts that do not conform to the submission guidelines may be returned without review.

Submission

To submit to the editorial office of Aaron Due south. Benjamin, delight submit manuscripts electronically through the Manuscript Submission Portal in Microsoft Word or Open Office format.

Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Transmission of the American Psychological Association using the seven^th edition. Manuscripts may exist copyedited for bias-complimentary language (see Affiliate 5 of the Publication Manual).

Submit Manuscript

Aaron S. Benjamin
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
827 Psychology Bldg.
603 East. Daniel Street
M/C 716
Champaign, IL 61820

Acceptable formats include: Microsoft Word Certificate (.dr. or .docx) and LaTeX (.tex) with Portable Document Format (.pdf) of the manuscript file.

When submitting a manuscript electronically, authors should blazon their abstract directly into the Abstract text box in the submission form or save their abstruse as a text file and copy and paste information technology from that file. Whatever special formatting (from a Word document, for case) volition be lost when the class is submitted.

The editorial policy of the journal encompasses integrative articles containing multiple experiments as well every bit articles reporting unmarried experiments. The journal likewise publishes commentaries and theoretical notes. Please notation that theoretical notes are limited to a maximum of 25 pages of text. Commentaries on articles should be at maximum one-half the length of the target commodity.

JEP:LMC is now using a software system to screen submitted content for similarity with other published content. The system compares the initial version of each submitted manuscript against a database of 40+ million scholarly documents, also every bit content actualization on the open up web. This allows APA to check submissions for potential overlap with material previously published in scholarly journals (eastward.g., lifted or republished material).

Direct replications

The journal publishes straight replications. Submissions should include "A Replication of XX Study" in the subtitle of the manuscript equally well as in the abstract.

Registered Reports

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (JEP:LMC) accepts Registered Reports (RR) every bit an commodity type. To acquire more about RR, please consult the general guidelines and information at the Center for Open Science and at Peer Community In. Nosotros are a PCI-RR-interested journal, which means that articles that pass review at PCI can enter the review process at JEP:LMC.

Registered Reports at JEP:LMC must come across the usual stringent standards for scientific rigor and validity. In add-on, as with whatsoever article at JEP:LMC, articles are expected to advance theory about basic cognitive functions.

Access the flowchart on editorial conclusion-making almost Registered Reports at JEP:LMC. Please download it and consider whether your proposal meets requirements prior to submission.

Registered Reports submissions can propose novel research or replications of prior work that was published in JEP:LMC or elsewhere.

Proposals can include preliminary data. Multi-experiment proposals in which some experiments are completed are others are proposed are frequently an appealing approach to a complicated question.

Publications may be allowed to include exploratory analyses non included in the proposal. These analyses should be conspicuously labeled as exploratory and their inclusion volition exist informed in function past the outcome of Stage 2 peer review.

Power should be high and should allow fair comparison of competing hypotheses. Sample size tin take into account the costs of sampling (for example, with hard-to-recruit populations).

There is no deadline for Stage ii submission following Stage 1 acceptance, but the authors must accept some chance that scientific findings that arise in the interim may influence Stage 2 review. No Stage ii paper will be rejected only because the cadre result has been published by others in that acting period.

Cover letter of the alphabet

Your embrace letter must include the following information:

• Contact data for each author, including valid email address, affiliation, mailing accost, as well as phone and fax numbers
• A argument that your manuscript is original, not previously published, and not under concurrent consideration elsewhere
• If your embrace letter does not comprise this information, you will receive a written request from JEP: LMC asking for a revised encompass letter of the alphabet.

When submitting your manuscript, delight include your cover letter in its entirety past copying it to the text box provided in the Manuscript Submission Portal. Unfortunately, the portal cannot currently accept formatted embrace letters. Fifty-fifty if you transport a formatted version of your letter to the Journal, nosotros must besides have a text version of your embrace letter.

If you are submitting a revision, feel free to email a formatted version of your cover letter of the alphabet to the editorial office, though you must yet also transport a text version of your cover letter through the portal as y'all're uploading your revision.

Manuscript submission acknowledgment

Once authors have submitted their manuscript through the submission portal, an email acknowledging receipt of the manuscript volition be sent to the respective author. If this acknowledgment e-mail does not reach the corresponding author inside a few days of submitting the manuscript, delight contact the editorial office.

Anonymous review

Anonymous review is optional. If an author wants bearding review, a "Masked" article blazon must be selected upon submission, and the request should exist included in the author'southward cover letter.

The manuscript receiving anonymous review should exist formatted as follows:

Make sure that the manuscript itself contains no clues to the authors' identity, including grant numbers, names of institutions providing IRB approval, self-citations, and links to online repositories for data, materials, code, or preregistrations (east.yard., Create a View-only Link for a Projection). All author-identifying information should be removed from the manuscript, including authors' names and affiliations on the title page, footnotes, and author notes. The properties of the file should too not reveal the authors' names.

The authors' contact information should instead exist included in the cover letter, which is not seen by the reviewers.

If your manuscript was mask reviewed, please ensure that the concluding version for production includes a byline and total author note for typesetting.

Related Journals of Experimental Psychology

For the other JEP journals, authors should submit manuscripts according to the manuscript submission guidelines for each individual JEP periodical:

• Periodical of Experimental Psychology: Creature Learning and Cognition
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Practical
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Full general
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

When one of the editors believes a manuscript is clearly more advisable for an alternative APA journal, the editor may redirect the manuscript with the blessing of the author.

Manuscript preparation

Fix manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association using the 7th edition. Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free linguistic communication (see Chapter 5 of the Publication Transmission).

Review APA'due south Journal Manuscript Preparation Guidelines before submitting your commodity.

Double-space all copy. Other formatting instructions, equally well as instructions on preparing tables, figures, references, metrics, and abstracts, appear in the Manual. Additional guidance on APA Style is available on the APA Style website.

Below are additional instructions regarding the preparation of display equations, computer lawmaking, and tables.

Display equations

We strongly encourage you to use MathType (third-party software) or Equation Editor 3.0 (congenital into pre-2007 versions of Word) to construct your equations, rather than the equation support that is built into Word 2007 and Discussion 2010. Equations equanimous with the built-in Give-and-take 2007/Word 2010 equation back up are converted to low-resolution graphics when they enter the production process and must be rekeyed by the typesetter, which may innovate errors.

To construct your equations with MathType or Equation Editor iii.0:

• Go to the Text section of the Insert tab and select Object.
• Select MathType or Equation Editor 3.0 in the drop-down card.

If you have an equation that has already been produced using Microsoft Word 2007 or 2010 and you have access to the full version of MathType half dozen.five or later, you can convert this equation to MathType by clicking on MathType Insert Equation. Copy the equation from Microsoft Word and paste it into the MathType box. Verify that your equation is correct, click File, and then click Update. Your equation has at present been inserted into your Word file every bit a MathType Equation.

Apply Equation Editor 3.0 or MathType only for equations or for formulas that cannot be produced as Discussion text using the Times or Symbol font.

Computer code

Because altering estimator code in any style (e.one thousand., indents, line spacing, line breaks, page breaks) during the typesetting process could alter its meaning, we treat computer code differently from the residue of your article in our production process. To that terminate, we request carve up files for reckoner lawmaking.

In online supplemental material

We request that runnable source code be included equally supplemental material to the article. For more information, visit Supplementing Your Commodity With Online Material.

In the text of the commodity

If you would like to include code in the text of your published manuscript, please submit a separate file with your code exactly as you lot want it to appear, using Courier New font with a blazon size of viii points. Nosotros will make an image of each segment of code in your article that exceeds twoscore characters in length. (Shorter snippets of code that appear in text volition be typeset in Courier New and run in with the residue of the text.) If an appendix contains a mix of code and explanatory text, please submit a file that contains the entire appendix, with the code keyed in 8-point Courier New.

Tables

Use Word'south insert table part when you create tables. Using spaces or tabs in your table will create bug when the tabular array is typeset and may result in errors.

LaTex files

LaTex files (.tex) should be uploaded with all other files such as BibTeX Generated Bibliography File (.bbl) or Bibliography Certificate (.bib) together in a compressed ZIP file folder for the manuscript submission procedure. In add-on, a Portable Document Format (.pdf) of the manuscript file must exist uploaded for the peer-review process.

Bookish writing and English linguistic communication editing services

Authors who feel that their manuscript may benefit from additional academic writing or linguistic communication editing support prior to submission are encouraged to seek out such services at their host institutions, appoint with colleagues and subject matter experts, and/or consider several vendors that offer discounts to APA authors.

Delight annotation that APA does non endorse or take responsibility for the service providers listed. It is strictly a referral service.

Apply of such service is non mandatory for publication in an APA journal. Utilise of ane or more of these services does non guarantee selection for peer review, manuscript acceptance, or preference for publication in any APA periodical.

Submitting supplemental materials

APA tin identify supplemental materials online, available via the published article in the PsycArticles^® database. Please encounter Supplementing Your Article With Online Material for more details.

Abstruse and keywords

All manuscripts must include an abstract containing a maximum of 250 words typed on a split up page. Later the abstract, please supply up to 5 keywords or cursory phrases.

References

List references in alphabetical society. Each listed reference should be cited in text, and each text citation should be listed in the references section.

Examples of basic reference formats:

Journal article

McCauley, South. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Linguistic communication learning equally language utilize: A cross-linguistic model of child linguistic communication evolution. Psychological Review, 126(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126

Authored book

Brownish, 50. South. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000

Chapter in an edited volume

Balsam, K. F., Martell, C. R., Jones. K. P., & Safren, S. A. (2019). Affirmative cognitive behavior therapy with sexual and gender minority people. In Chiliad. Y. Iwamasa & P. A. Hays (Eds.), Culturally responsive cognitive behavior therapy: Exercise and supervision (2nd ed., pp. 287–314). American Psychological Clan. https://doi.org/ten.1037/0000119-012

Information set up citation

Alegria, One thousand., Jackson, J. S., Kessler, R. C., & Takeuchi, D. (2016). Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), 2001–2003 [Data set]. Inter-academy Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20240.v8

Software/Code citation

Viechtbauer, Westward. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/

Wickham, H. et al., (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, four(43), 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

All information, program code, and other methods must be accordingly cited in the text and listed in the references section.

Figures

Graphics files are welcome if supplied every bit Tiff or EPS files. Multipanel figures (i.e., figures with parts labeled a, b, c, d, etc.) should be assembled into one file.

The minimum line weight for line fine art is 0.5 point for optimal printing.

For more information about acceptable resolutions, fonts, sizing, and other figure issues, delight come across the general guidelines.

When possible, please place symbol legends beneath the figure instead of to the side.

APA offers authors the pick to publish their figures online in color without the costs associated with print publication of color figures.

The same caption will appear on both the online (color) and print (black and white) versions. To ensure that the effigy tin be understood in both formats, authors should add alternative wording (due east.g., "the red (dark gray) bars represent") as needed.

For authors who prefer their figures to exist published in color both in print and online, original color figures can exist printed in color at the editor'south and publisher's discretion provided the author agrees to pay:

• $900 for i effigy
• An additional $600 for the second figure
• An additional $450 for each subsequent figure

Permissions

Authors of accepted papers must obtain and provide to the editor on final acceptance all necessary permissions to reproduce in print and electronic form any copyrighted piece of work, including test materials (or portions thereof), photographs, and other graphic images (including those used as stimuli in experiments).

On advice of counsel, APA may decline to publish whatsoever epitome whose copyright status is unknown.

• Download Permissions Alert Class (PDF, 13KB)

Reporting standards

Journal Article Reporting Standards

Authors should consider the APA Way Periodical Article Reporting Standards (JARS) for a helpful resource for reporting information and the outcomes of inferential statistical tests. The standards offering means to improve transparency in reporting to ensure that readers have the data necessary to evaluate the quality of the inquiry and to facilitate collaboration and replication.

The JARS:

• recommend the partitioning of hypotheses, analyses, and conclusions into master, secondary, and exploratory groupings to allow for a full understanding of quantitative analyses presented in a manuscript and to raise reproducibility;
• offering modules for authors reporting on replications, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, and observational studies, as well equally the analytic methods of structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis; and
• include guidelines on reporting of report preregistration (including making protocols public); participant characteristics (including demographic characteristics); inclusion and exclusion criteria; psychometric characteristics of result measures and other variables; and planned data diagnostics and analytic strategy.

The guidelines focus on transparency in methods reporting, recommending descriptions of how the researcher's own perspective affected the study, also as the contexts in which the research and analysis took place.

Transparency and openness

Empirical research, including meta-analyses, submitted to the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Retentivity, and Cognition must run into Level 1 (Disclosure) for all eight aspects of inquiry planning and reporting as well as Level 2 (Requirement) for commendation; data, materials, and code transparency; and study and assay programme preregistration. Authors should include a subsection in the method department titled "Transparency and openness." This subsection should item the efforts the authors have made to comply with the TOP guidelines.

For example:

• We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the study, and we follow JARS (Kazak, 2018). All information, analysis code, and research materials are available at [stable link to repository]. Data were analyzed using R, version 4.0.0 (R Core Squad, 2020) and the package ggplot, version three.two.1 (Wickham, 2016). This study's design and its analysis were not pre-registered.

Links to preregistrations and data, code, and materials should too be included in the author note.

Data, materials, and code

Authors must country whether data and study materials are available and, if and then, where to admission them. Recommended repositories include APA's repository on the Open Science Framework (OSF), or authors can access a full listing of other recommended repositories.

In both the author note and at the end of the method section, specify whether and where the data and material will be available or notation the legal or ethical reasons for non doing and so. For submissions with quantitative or simulation analytic methods, state whether the study analysis lawmaking is available, (e.grand., scripts for generating stimuli, conducting simulations, or performing data analyses) is available, and, if so, where to access it or the legal or ethical reason why it is not available.

For example:

• All data have been made publicly available at the [repository proper noun] and can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].
• Materials and analysis code for this study are not bachelor.
• The code behind this assay/simulation has been fabricated publicly available at the [repository name] and tin can be accessed at [persistent URL or DOI].

Preregistration of studies and assay plans

Preregistration of studies and specific hypotheses tin be a useful tool for making stiff theoretical claims. Likewise, preregistration of assay plans can be useful for distinguishing confirmatory and exploratory analyses. Investigators are encouraged to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the inquiry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov or the Preregistration for Quantitative Research in Psychology template) via a publicly attainable registry arrangement (e.k., OSF, ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network).

Articles must state whether or not any work was preregistered and, if so, where to access the preregistration. Preregistrations must be available to reviewers; authors may submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material. Links in the method section and the author note should be replaced with an identifiable re-create on acceptance.

For example:

• This written report's pattern was preregistered; see [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This report'southward pattern and hypotheses were preregistered; run into [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This written report'due south analysis plan was preregistered; encounter [STABLE LINK OR DOI].
• This study was non preregistered.

Open science badges

Manufactures are eligible for open up science badges recognizing publicly available data, materials, and/or preregistration plans and analyses. These badges are awarded on a self-disclosure ground.

At submission, authors must ostend that criteria have been fulfilled in a signed badge disclosure form (PDF, 33KB) that must be submitted equally supplemental material. If all criteria are met equally confirmed past the editor, the course volition so be published with the article as supplemental fabric.

Authors should too note their eligibility for the badge(s) in the cover letter.

For all badges, items must be fabricated bachelor on an open-access repository with a persistent identifier in a format that is time-stamped, immutable, and permanent. For the preregistered badge, this is an institutional registration organisation.

Data and materials must be fabricated bachelor nether an open license allowing others to copy, share, and utilize the information, with attribution and copyright as applicable.

Bachelor badges are:

Open Information:
All data necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable are made publicly bachelor. Information necessary for replication (e.thou., codebooks or metadata) must be included.

Open Information; Protected Access:
A Protected Access (PA) notation may be added to open data badges if sensitive, personal data are available only from an approved third-party repository that manages admission to data to qualified researchers through a documented procedure. To be eligible for an open up data badge with such a annotation, the repository must publicly draw the steps necessary to obtain the information and detailed data documentation (e.g. variable names and allowed values) must exist made available publicly. Manuscripts with data deposited in ICPSR'south database are eligible for this bluecoat.

Open Materials:
All materials necessary to reproduce the reported results that are digitally shareable, forth with descriptions of non-digital materials necessary for replication, are made publicly available.

Preregistered:
At least one report's pattern has been preregistered with descriptions of (a) the inquiry blueprint and written report materials, including the planned sample size; (b) the motivating research question or hypothesis; (c) the outcome variable(southward); and (d) the predictor variables, including controls, covariates, and contained variables. Results must exist fully disclosed. Every bit long as they are distinguished from other results in the article, results from analyses that were not preregistered may be reported in the article.

Preregistered+Assay Plan:
At least ane report'due south pattern has been preregistered forth with an analysis plan for the research — and results are recorded according to that program.

Note that information technology may not exist possible to preregister a study or to share data and materials. Applying for open scientific discipline badges is optional.

Publication policies

APA policy prohibits an writer from submitting the aforementioned manuscript for concurrent consideration by two or more publications.

See likewise APA Journals^® Internet Posting Guidelines.

APA requires authors to reveal any possible disharmonize of involvement in the conduct and reporting of enquiry (e.yard., financial interests in a examination or procedure, funding past pharmaceutical companies for drug research).

• Download Disclosure of Interests Form (PDF, 38KB)

In lite of changing patterns of scientific noesis dissemination, APA requires authors to provide information on prior dissemination of the data and narrative interpretations of the data/research appearing in the manuscript (eastward.g., if some or all were presented at a conference or meeting, posted on a listserv, shared on a website, including bookish social networks like ResearchGate, etc.). This data (2–4 sentences) must be provided as part of the Author Note.

Authors of accepted manuscripts are required to transfer the copyright to APA.

• For manuscripts not funded past the Wellcome Trust or the Research Councils United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
  Publication Rights (Copyright Transfer) Form (PDF, 83KB)
• For manuscripts funded by the Wellcome Trust or the Enquiry Councils UK
  Wellcome Trust or Enquiry Councils UK Publication Rights Class (PDF, 34KB)

Upstanding Principles

It is a violation of APA Ethical Principles to publish "equally original data, data that have been previously published" (Standard 8.13).

In addition, APA Ethical Principles specify that "after inquiry results are published, psychologists practice not withhold the data on which their conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the substantive claims through reanalysis and who intend to use such information only for that purpose, provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights apropos proprietary data prevent their release" (Standard 8.xiv).

APA expects authors to adhere to these standards. Specifically, APA expects authors to accept their data bachelor throughout the editorial review process and for at to the lowest degree five years later the appointment of publication.

Authors are required to state in writing that they accept complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of their sample, human or fauna, or to describe the details of treatment.

• Download Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles Grade (PDF, 26KB)

The APA Ideals Office provides the full Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Bear electronically on its website in HTML, PDF, and Discussion format. You may also request a copy by emailing or calling the APA Ethics Office (202-336-5930). You may also read "Ethical Principles," December 1992, American Psychologist, Vol. 47, pp. 1597–1611.

Other information

Visit the Journals Publishing Resources Center for more resources for writing, reviewing, and editing manufactures for publishing in APA journals.

Editorial Board

Editor

Aaron Due south. Benjamin, PhD
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United States

Acquaintance editors

Erik M. Altmann, PhD
Michigan State University, United States

Julie M. Bugg, PhD
Washington Academy in St. Louis, Us

Heather J. Ferguson, PhD
Academy of Kent, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland

Andrew Hollingworth, PhD
University of Iowa, United States

Keith Hutchison, PhD
Montana Land Academy, U.s.

Klaus Oberauer, PhD
Academy of Zürich, Switzerland

Matthew G. Rhodes, PhD
Colorado Country University, U.s.a.

Jörg Rieskamp, PhD
University of Basel, Switzerland

Evan Risko, PhD
University of Waterloo, Canada

Adam Sanborn, PhD
Academy of Warwick, U.k.

Nash Unsworth, PhD
Academy of Oregon, Us

Tessa C. Warren, PhD
University of Pittsburgh, United States

Duane Chiliad. Watson, PhD
Vanderbilt University, U.s.a.

Jennifer Wiley, PhD
Academy of Illinois at Chicago, United States

Consulting editors

Jeanette Altarriba, PhD
Academy at Albany & Country University of New York, United States

Sally Andrews, PhD
Academy of Sydney, Australia

Blair C. Armstrong, PhD
University of Toronto, Canada

Jason Arndt, PhD
Middlebury College, Us

Kate Arrington, PhD
Lehigh University, The states

Hunter Ball, PhD
University of Texas at Arlington, United States

Karl-Heinz Thomas Bäuml, PhD
Regensburg University, Deutschland

Julie E. Boland, PhD
University of Michigan, United States

C. J. Brainerd, PhD
Cornell Academy, Us

David Westward. Braithwaite, PhD
Florida State University, United States

Cistron A. Brewer, PhD
Arizona Country University, U.s.

Thomas Busey, PhD
Indiana University, Bloomington, United States

Andrew C. Butler, PhD
Washington Academy in St. Louis, United states

Valérie Camos, PhD
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland

Laura Carlson, PhD
University of Notre Dame, The states

Richard A. Carlson, PhD
The Pennsylvania Country University, United States

Shana Carpenter, PhD
Iowa Country Academy, United States

Anne Thousand. Cleary, PhD
Colorado State University, United States

Gabriel I. Cook, PhD
Claremont McKenna College, Us

Sarah Creel, PhD
University of California, San Diego, United States

Matthew J. C. Crump, PhD
Brooklyn College of CUNY, U.s.

Peter F. Delaney, PhD
University of Due north Carolina at Greensboro, United states

Gary S. Dell, PhD
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United states

Gesine Dreisbach, PhD
Universität Regensburg, Germany

Nicolas Dumay, PhD
Academy of Exeter, Great britain

John Dunlosky, PhD
Kent State University, United States

Lisa K. Fazio, PhD
Vanderbilt Academy, The states

Laurie Beth Feldman, PhD
Land Academy of New York at Albany, United States

Myra A. Fernandes, PhD
University of Waterloo, Canada

Ruth Filik, PhD
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Bridgid Finn, PhD
Educational Testing Service, United States

Rico Fischer, PhD
University of Greifswald, Deutschland

Wendy S. Francis, PhD
University of Texas at El Paso, United states

David A. Gallo, PhD
University of Chicago, U.s.a.

Tamar H. Gollan, PhD
Academy of California, San Diego, Usa

Corentin Gonthier, PhD
Academy of Rennes 2, French republic

James A. Hampton, PhD
City University of London, United kingdom

Alice F. Healy, PhD
Academy of Colorado, Bedrock, U.s.

William South. Horton, PhD
Northwestern Academy, The states

Kathleen L. Hourihan, PhD
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

Darlene Five. Howard, PhD
Georgetown University, United States

Yi Ting Huang, PhD
University of Maryland College Park, United States

R. Reed Hunt, PhD
Academy of Mississippi, United States

Edward Matthew Husband, PhD
University of Oxford, United kingdom

Helene Intraub, PhD
University of Delaware, U.s.a.

Andrew F. Jarosz, PhD
Mississippi State University, U.s.a.

Luis Jimenez, PhD
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Kingdom of spain

Michael J. Kane, PhD
University of North Carolina at Greensboro, The states

Jeffrey D. Karpicke, PhD
Purdue Academy, United states

David Kellen, PhD
Syracuse University, United States

Jonathan W. Kelly, PhD
Iowa Country University, United States

Annette Kinder, PhD
Freie Universitaet Berlin, Germany

Sachiko Kinoshita, PhD
Macquarie University, Australia

Karl Christoph Klauer, PhD
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland

Iring Koch, PhD
RWTH Aachen University, Frg

Agnieszka E. Konopka, PhD
University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Mike Eastward. Le Pelley, PhD
UNSW Sydney, Australia

Robyn A. LeBoeuf, PhD
Washington University in St. Louis, United States

Vanessa M. Loaiza, PhD
University of Essex, United Kingdom

Stephen J. Lupker, PhD
University of Western Ontario, Canada

Brooke N. Macnamara, PhD
Case Western Reserve University, United States

Kenneth J. Malmberg, PhD
University of South Florida, United States

Randi Martin, PhD
Rice University, Us

Sven Mattys, PhD
The Academy of York, U.k.

Antje S. Meyer, PhD
Max Planck Plant for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands

John Paul Minda, PhD
University of Western Ontario, Canada

Weimin Mou, PhD
Academy of Alberta, Canada

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, PhD
University of Missouri, United States

James H. Neely, PhD
University at Albany & State Academy of New York, U.s.

David E. Over, PhD
Durham University, Uk

Thorsten Pachur, PhD
Max Planck Institute for Human being Development, Germany

Manuel Perea, PhD
Universitat de València, Espana

Pierre Perruchet, PhD
Université de Bourgogne, France

John Philbeck, PhD
George Washington University, U.s.

Valerie F. Reyna, PhD
Cornell University, United States

Henry 50. Roediger 3, PhD
Washington Academy in St. Louis, U.s.

Nathan S. Rose, PhD
University of Notre Dame, Usa

Caren Chiliad. Rotello, PhD
Academy of Massachusetts, United states

Jan Rummel, PhD
Heidelberg University, Federal republic of germany

Lili Sahakyan, PhD
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, U.s.a.

Elizabeth Roye Schotter, PhD
Academy of South Florida, Usa

Colleen M. Seifert, PhD
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Usa

L. Robert Slevc, PhD
University of Maryland, College Park, Usa

Rebekah Smith, PhD
Academy of Mississippi, United States

Jeff Starns, PhD
University of Massachusetts Amherst, U.s.a.

Adrian Staub, PhD
University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States

Benjamin C. Tempest, PhD
University of California, Santa Cruz, U.s.a.

Aimee Yard. Surprenant, PhD
Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

Holly A. Taylor, PhD
Tufts University, The states

Anjali Thapar, PhD
Bryn Mawr College, United States

Catherine Thevenot, PhD
University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Ayanna Thousand. Thomas, PhD
Tufts Academy, U.s.a.

Jonathan Garrett Tullis, PhD
Academy of Arizona, United states

Monika Undorf, PhD
University of Mannheim, Frg

Mieke Verfaellie, PhD
Boston University & VA Boston Healthcare Arrangement, United States

Timothy J. Vickery, PhD
University of Delaware, United States

Michael S. Vitevitch, PhD
Academy of Kansas, Usa

Chris Wahlheim, PhD
University of Northward Carolina at Greensboro, United States

Deanne Westerman, PhD
Binghamton University & Country University of New York, United States

Holger Wiese, PhD
Durham University, United Kingdom

Anna One thousand. Woollams, PhD
University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Naohide Yamamoto, PhD
Queensland University of Engineering, Australia

Andrew Yonelinas, PhD
Academy of California Davis, United States

Peer review coordinator

Sonya Volsky
American Psychological Association

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and indexing services providing coverage of Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ^®

• Academic OneFile
• Academic Search Alumni Edition
• Academic Search Consummate
• Academic Search Elite
• Academic Search Alphabetize
• Bookish Search Premier
• Avant-garde Placement Psychology Collection
• Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS)
• BIOSIS Previews
• Business organisation Source Alumni Edition
• Business Source Complete
• Concern Source Corporate Plus
• Business Source Elite
• Business Source Index
• Business Source Premier
• Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Psychology
• Communication & Mass Media Complete
• Communication Source
• Current Abstracts
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• EBSCO MegaFILE
• Education Abstracts
• Teaching Full Text
• Teaching Enquiry Consummate
• Education Source
• Educational Research Abstracts Online
• Educator'southward Reference Complete
• Ergonomics Abstracts
• ERIC
• ERIH (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
• Expanded Academic ASAP
• General OneFile
• Full general Scientific discipline Drove
• Health & Health Resource Eye and Culling Wellness Module
• Health Reference Heart Bookish
• Humanities and Social Sciences Index Retrospective
• IBZ / IBR (Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur)
• InfoTrac Custom
• Journal Citations Study: Social Sciences Edition
• MEDLINE
• MLA International Bibliography
• NSA Collection
• OCLC
• OmniFile Full Text Mega
• PASCAL
• Professional ProQuest Central
• ProQuest Central
• ProQuest Discovery
• ProQuest Platinum Periodicals
• ProQuest Psychology Journals
• ProQuest Research Library
• ProQuest Social Scientific discipline Journals
• Psychology Collection
• PsycInfo
• PsycLine
• RILM Abstracts of Music Literature
• SafetyLit
• Scientific discipline Citation Index Expanded
• SCOPUS
• Social Sciences Abstracts
• Social Sciences Citation Index
• Social Sciences Total Text
• Social Sciences Index Retrospective
• Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts
• TOC Premier

Open Scientific discipline

Transparency and Openness Promotion

APA endorses the Transparency and Openness Promotion (Height) Guidelines by a community working group in conjunction with the Centre for Open Science (Nosek et al. 2015). The TOP Guidelines cover viii primal aspects of research planning and reporting that can be followed by journals and authors at 3 levels of compliance.

For example:

• Level 1: Disclosure—The commodity must disclose whether or not the materials are available.
• Level ii: Requirement—The commodity must share materials when legally and ethically permitted (or disclose the legal and/or ethical restriction when non permitted).
• Level 3: Verification—A tertiary party must verify that the standard is met.

Equally of July one, 2021, empirical research, including meta-analyses, submitted to the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition must, at a minimum, meet Level ane (Disclosure) for all viii aspects of research planning and reporting likewise as Level 2 (Requirement) for citation; data, code, and materials transparency; and study and analysis plan preregistration. Authors should include a subsection in their methods clarification titled "Transparency and openness." This subsection should detail the efforts the authors have made to comply with the TOP guidelines.

The list beneath summarizes the minimal TOP requirements of the periodical. Please refer to the Center for Open Science Height guidelines for details, and contact the editor (Aaron S. Benjamin, PhD) with any further questions. APA recommends sharing data, materials, and code via trusted repositories (e.g., APA's repository on the Open Science Framework (OSF)), and nosotros encourage investigators to preregister their studies and analysis plans prior to conducting the research. There are many bachelor preregistration forms (e.m., the APA Preregistration for Quantitative Research in Psychology template, ClininalTrials.gov, or other preregistration templates available via OSF). Completed preregistration forms should be posted on a publicly accessible registry system (e.g., OSF, ClinicalTrials.gov, or other trial registries in the WHO Registry Network).

A list of participating journals is also bachelor from APA.

The post-obit list presents the eight fundamental aspects of research planning and reporting, the TOP level required by the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Knowledge, and a brief description of the periodical'southward policy.

• Citation: Level 2, Requirement—All data, program code, and other methods developed by others must be appropriately cited in the text and listed in the references section.
• Data Transparency: Level 2, Requirement—Commodity states whether the raw and/or processed information on which written report conclusions are based are available and either where to access them or the legal or ethical reasons why they are not available.
• Analytic Methods (Lawmaking) Transparency: Level two, Requirement—Article states whether computer code or syntax needed to reproduce analyses in an article is available and either where to access it or the legal or ethical reasons why it is non bachelor.
• Enquiry Materials Transparency: Level two, Requirement—Article states whether materials described in the method section are bachelor and either where to access them or the legal or ethical reasons why they are not available.
• Design and Assay Transparency (Reporting Standards): Level 1, Disclosure—Authors should consider APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS-Quant, JARS-Qual, and/or MARS) as a helpful resource for reporting information and the outcomes of inferential statistical tests.
• Study Preregistration: Level 2, Requirement—Commodity states whether the written report blueprint and (if applicable) hypotheses of any of the piece of work reported was preregistered and, if so, where to access information technology. Admission to the preregistration must be available at submission. Authors requesting masked review should submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental textile.
• Analysis Plan Preregistration: Level ii, Requirement—Article states whether whatsoever of the piece of work reported preregistered an analysis programme and, if and then, where to access it. Access to the preregistration must be bachelor at submission. Authors requesting masked review should submit a masked copy via stable link or supplemental material.

Other open up science initiatives

• Open Science badges: Offered
• Public significance statements: Not offered
• Author contribution statements using CRediT: Not required
• Registered Reports: Published
• Replications: Published

Explore open science at APA.

watsonwhemighthis.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xlm/

Share this post